gov_action1t87n2vjnavthuggyarerafxx8c7n9mu4c7r96qlfp5uggsjdc8dsqymg588
Action Identifier
gov_action1t87n2vjnavthuggyarerafxx8c7n9mu4c7r96qlfp5uggsjdc8dsqymg588 [1]
Atlantic Council Vote Results
| Vote |
Tally |
| Constitutional |
0 |
| Unconstitutional |
0 |
| Abstain |
6 |
| Did Not Vote |
0 |
Supporting Rationale
- As the Interim Constitutional Committee, our primary responsibility is to
safeguard the integrity of Cardano’s governance framework. By choosing to
abstain from this proposal, we avoid setting a precedent in cases where
sentiment-based proposals are not tied to substantive governance changes. This
allows the community’s voices to guide the process without intervention from
the Committee, preserving neutrality and ensuring that our involvement remains
focused on matters that directly impact governance or require constitutional
interpretation. [2: Article VI, Section 1]
Dissenting Rationale
Considerations
- There is nothing
Unconstitutional about this proposal given that it
explicitly desires no change or impact to the governance of Cardano either
on-chain or off-chain.
- Voting
Constitutional on this largely positive proposal could be used as a
precedent weapon in the future to argue for an endorsing vote on a proposal
that takes a more critical and negative, potentially libelous, tone.
References
- CardanoScan Governance
Explorer, https://cardanoscan.io/govAction/gov_action1t87n2vjnavthuggyarerafxx8c7n9mu4c7r96qlfp5uggsjdc8dsqymg588
- Interim
Constitution, https://constitution.gov.tools